JSP
Member
The engine on my 1.7L Puma has died, so I will be getting a new one put in.
I have the option of putting in another 1.7L Puma engine and whilst I'm at it having it tuned/remapped to make it a bit quicker, or I could have a completely different engine put in it, (either 2L or 2.3L Duratec).
Ball park figures are around £3k for the Puma engine and £5k for either of the other two.
With the Puma engine being the cheapest option I naturally favour that one. However, I am worried that having spent the £3k on it, if someone runs into me it'll be written off.
I understand that I can have an agreed value put onto my policy, (subject to my insurers approval), which would allay my fears a little but in that case am I best sticking with the Puma engine tuned or should I just go for a different engine? I am wondering if, (because it's a more expensive modification), it would increase the agreed value of the car more than the tuning of a standard 1.7L engine would.
My broker was unable to give any indication because I'd need to fill in the form and the insurers make the decision, but they'll only do that once the mods have been done. Whereas I'd like to know the effect it'll have on the cars value before I make the modification as it will effect which one I choose.
Any member views/experiences regarding this would be much appreciated, as would those from anyone in the insurance industry.
Thanks in advance.
I have the option of putting in another 1.7L Puma engine and whilst I'm at it having it tuned/remapped to make it a bit quicker, or I could have a completely different engine put in it, (either 2L or 2.3L Duratec).
Ball park figures are around £3k for the Puma engine and £5k for either of the other two.
With the Puma engine being the cheapest option I naturally favour that one. However, I am worried that having spent the £3k on it, if someone runs into me it'll be written off.
I understand that I can have an agreed value put onto my policy, (subject to my insurers approval), which would allay my fears a little but in that case am I best sticking with the Puma engine tuned or should I just go for a different engine? I am wondering if, (because it's a more expensive modification), it would increase the agreed value of the car more than the tuning of a standard 1.7L engine would.
My broker was unable to give any indication because I'd need to fill in the form and the insurers make the decision, but they'll only do that once the mods have been done. Whereas I'd like to know the effect it'll have on the cars value before I make the modification as it will effect which one I choose.
Any member views/experiences regarding this would be much appreciated, as would those from anyone in the insurance industry.
Thanks in advance.